Start with your own historical cases.
Before integrating another data platform, test TrueCostData against decisions you have already made.
Your cases stay minimal and anonymized.
The Diagnostic Study is designed to work with the minimum information required to reconstruct and compare historical market references. No policyholder or customer identity is required.
NDA Available
A confidentiality agreement can be executed before any case-level data is transferred.
No Personal Data Required
We do not require customer names, addresses, policyholder information or other direct personal identifiers for the diagnostic.
Minimal Case Dataset
Only the information necessary to reconstruct the historical reference and measure the case-level gap is requested.
Controlled Data Transfer
The transfer method and retention requirements are agreed before case-level files are exchanged.
A historical decision deserves a historical market reference.
Looking at today's market cannot tell you what was observable when a historical claim was evaluated. Listings change, offers disappear and screenshots provide only fragmented evidence.
What was the observable market reference at the date of the claim — and how does it compare with the value you retained?
Three steps. No integration project.
We work directly from a small anonymized historical sample. Your teams do not need to deploy an API, modify a claims system or launch an IT project.
Your historical cases
Product or asset model, relevant historical date, and the value retained in your decision.
The T-1 market reference
TrueCostData uses archived multi-source observations to reconstruct the market reference observable at that date.
The measured gap
T-1 reference, case-level difference, percentage gap and supporting evidence for each historical case.
A controlled test on your own decisions.
The purpose is simple: determine whether a measurable market-reference gap exists before discussing monitoring, software or integration.
- Asset / product model
- Historical claim date
- Value retained
- Anonymized case identifier
- Historical T-1 reference
- Archived market observations
- Case-level comparison
- Gap in € and %
- Executive PDF report
- Case-level CSV
- Consolidated gap analysis
- 30-minute findings review
The study is designed to answer economic questions, not showcase software.
At the end of the diagnostic, the objective is to understand whether the observed differences are economically meaningful and whether they justify further monitoring.
Historical Alignment
How closely did your retained historical values align with the reconstructed T-1 market reference?
Financial Gap
Which cases show material differences, in which direction, and what is their aggregate financial magnitude?
Repeatability
Are the observed differences isolated cases, or does a recurring pattern appear across the historical sample?
The evidence determines the next step.
The Diagnostic Study does not require a subsequent subscription. The result itself determines whether continued work is economically justified.
No material gap
The study ends. You keep the report and the case-level results. No further deployment is required.
Recurring signal
Extend the analysis into continuous market monitoring on the asset categories where the signal matters.
Operational use case
If the reference becomes operationally relevant, evaluate API delivery and integration into existing workflows.
Don't start with an integration. Start with evidence.
Give us 20 historical cases. Five business days later, you will have a documented comparison against reconstructed T-1 market references.